Monday, 30 April 2012

To Die For

Your weekend’s almost over and you want to head off Monday morning blues with an all-the-rage, no-stress remedy? Here’s how.

What: Slunch with a twist
Where: Ours
When: This coming Sunday
Time: 5.00pm onwards
Dress: Casual chic (as usual)
Ambiance: chill-out
Brunch is not démodé. This is its alternative! Looking forward to seeing you all, chéris!

Start with the sweet and work your way backwards. The theme, because themes are always such fun, is to raise awareness.

The sweet.  To whet your appetites, mes chéris, to whet your appetites!

Red Velvet Gateau.
Isn’t it a marvel?
The extra dark chocolate.
The deep strawberry-red.
What a delight! How original!
And the buttercream.
Simply melts in your mouth!

We thought the cake should be shaped like a torso. A woman’s torso! And, yes, why not a Black African woman’s torso, for this dark, ugly thing happens down there—in Dark Africa! Were you aware of it?

Yes, mmmm.

The cake is absolutely delicious!
So moist,
So luscious,
To die for.

And the chocolate!
So dark, so bitter.
Perfect.

No words to describe
The buttercream!
So sinfully rich.
Exquisite?

For the savoury, we hesitated between tripe—we have a great tripe-cooked-in-cider recipe—and pasta, didn’t we, chéri? We settled for

Spaghettini bolognese,
Finesse oblige.
Also
Crudités,
With accompanying dips.
Of course you can have
A bit
Of everything.

Spaghettini makes you think of hair strands? Well.... Why not? Actually, how clever, ma chérie, how clever! That’s ... umm ... so much in line with our awareness theme. Lovely.

Of course we didn’t forget—the wine!

Burgundy red.
Organic.
Dry and lean.
Tart.
Prickling the palate.
Piquant.

Bolognese sauce. We love it hot and spicy. You do, too? Oh lovely! Goes well with the wine, doesn’t it? A burgundy, smooth as velvet.

Zaz found it rather harsh. Angular, she said it was. It lacked finesse, had an unpleasant finish. She also read too much into the dessert. It’s only cake, for heaven’s sake! Amazing how someone so with-it can display such flashes of ignorance!

Ah, Zaz! There you are, chérie! We were just talking about the mar-vellous wine! Did you know that it is organic? It is also rated very highly by the Consumer’s Guide to Fine Wines.

Listen up, everyone!
The dips are home-made—
No preservatives,
No artificial colouring,
All natural!
Guacamole,
Chilli cream cheese,
and
Hummus!

Don’t be put off by the dip here.

It’s only tapenade.
Black olives,
Capers and
Lemon juice—
For the tang!

I know the colour—so black!—is not that appealing. But tapenade is so français!  Give it a try, mes chéris. You’ll love it, I’m sure. It has a touch of brandy, too! But if you prefer, there are

Stuffed olives.
Pickled too,
For the bite!
They are nice.
Round.
Firm.
The flavours burst in your mouth!

Oh! What’s going on? He’s choking over a stuffed olive. Slap him on the back! He can’t breathe. Heimlich manoeuvre! He’s gasping for breath. Chéri! Chéri! Call 112.

Choking over a stuffed olive?
What a shame.
Can hardly breathe?
Shame.

Eat me.
And do not resuscitate.

(Weaving alongside P. Muthoni and W. Mwangi)

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Women's Voices: When Gender Comes to Visit


Warning and Disclaimer:
If you take life at face value, if you think there is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, if you think the sky will fall on your head at any time, if you never leave the house without an umbrella, do not read this.

All unnamed names in this post are not fictitious, and any resemblance to any actual, living person is not at all purely coincidental.

This voice is neither WeavingKenya 2012's (Weaving Women's group) spokesman nor representative. 

The unnamed names have every right to sue This voice, keeping in mind these two conditions:
- that they remember that they will be the very same unnamed names who will post her bail;
- if this voice is imprisoned for slander, defamation, sky-is-falling fallacies, the unnamed names will  visit her every Sunday and bring her oranges.


It all started with a simple question: Are we allowed to invite men to Weave?
The last time the Weaving Women had thrashed it out—not in the pulling-each-other’s-weaves-out-and-scratching-each-other’s-faces-with-painted-finger-nails sense, but in an intellectual fencing sense—it was over a Man out there who had played very loosely with the word “tribal.”

In an essay of less than 750 words, the journalist accomplished the feat of using the “T” word to ad nauseam, to qualify the words tremor, violence, rivalries, and divisions in Kenya. Only once did the “T” word stand up all tribal by itself, and only once did it use an –ism as a crutch to lean on.
This time round, the “T” word is not the issue. The issue is Man, or to put it in NGO-speak, Gender.
The first couple of replies to the simple question were sweet three or so liners from MM and JT: Yes, let’s! They said. The writers used words like “outstanding” and “strong voice” to refer to Man. One of them went as far as saying that Man would be an “outstanding thread in our weaving.” Whoooaaaaa.
Then, like Lazarus, up rose MM II from her sick-with-flu-bed. Yes, yes, I know that Lazarus rose from the grave, but that is beside the point. MM II gave Warhol’s 15 minutes (of fame) a New and Improved 21st-century twist, the artist would have been impressed.
In her 15 minutes of  quote allocated time online unquote, she managed to prove that she did not live in Three-liner County, by writing a slam dunk of  a dissertation on why Man could not, should not be allowed to Weave. Her argument was not that “Man” and “Weave” do not rhyme. We will get to her argument later for she is the one who got the (basket) ball rolling. What is worthy to note is that for someone down with the flu, she had one very clear head. Is that what Gender does to women with the flu?
The Man Aye-ayers waxed eloquent over Man’s qualities: fabulous, intelligent, sensitive, writes beautifully, clever, the best, sweet, gorgeous, funny, silly, big heart, outstanding, excellent, amazing, knowledgeable, strong voice, brilliantest (no, this was not a grammatical faux pas for all you pedantic readers. Today, the word means “beyond brilliant”). The Aye-ayers must have been quite breathless at the end of the exercise.
Man’s qualities made him more than right, more than ideal, more than perfect. They made him SuperMan. For the record, we don’t do Prince Charming in Africa; we neither have castles, nor do we build them on the ground or in the air. For the record, Africa is still not a country. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, I know. That, too, is beside the point.
One Aye-ayer went on to affirm that she “shamelessly want[ed] to and [did] hang around with intelligent, articulate people.” Man aka SuperMan, being knowledgeable and writing beautifully, could obviously string a few words together to structure a complex sentence with capital letters, commas, and full stops in all the right places. That, apparently, made him articulate.
The Nayers had their arguments, too, but without the Aye-ayers qualifying adjectives. So what if this Man was Mr. Oh-So-Gender-Sensitive Perfect? Why, there must be “so many great gender-sensitive men out there,” SN argued, “So???”
MWG was not impressed either. Let Man aka “that Kenyan prof/poet,” a Mortal, in WeavingKenya’s midst! Look what happens when “one man is let into the room.” Can you imagine the distraction?
This voice could imagine the distraction. It would be like setting a bull loose in a china shop. Literally, not figuratively. Forget the broken cups and saucers. Imagine the commotion. The wary get-me-outta-here! Or even the mesmerised look-at-that!
Everyone would forget what they came to do in the china shop; the bull (with all due respect to Man aka SuperMan aka That mortal Kenyan prof/poet) would become the Object of Attention. This voice is not even saying that the Aye-ayers would behave like Johnny Depp fans, or whichever Man-actor is flavour of the month, and swoon at the sight of distracting SuperMan, because we don’t do swoon in Africa. We faint.
This voice cannot imagine men being distracted in quite the same way if one of them were to ask a similar question: do we allow women into our group? Their criteria would need very few adjectival props, depending on their global location.
Criteria for Northern Hemisphere men: Tall, blue-eyed, blonde or Mediterranean look.
36-24-36.
Criteria for African men: Buxom. Skinny/slender/slim beanpoles need not apply.
Criteria for both categories: Curvy. Sexy. Number of brain cells.

Letting a “single man in our midst” MWG thought, would mean that we could not call/address ourselves as “Weaver Women” or “Sister Weavers.” She had a good point there, says This voice. Ever seen Man Weaving? Quilting? Knitting? Would WeavingKenya become “WeavingTitansKenya” or “ShujaaWeaversKenya” for that oomph factor? Would we address each other as “Amazons-Spartans Weavers”  or “WonderWomen-SuperMen Weavers” for gender equality’s sake?

The Nayers accurately observed that there were “too few places” for women “to meet together – in mind” (DF) and that women-only intellectual spaces were “valuable and so few and far between” (WKR).

It is true that WeavingKenya is a “young, tender shoot” to “protect and nurture” (JT); a cherished sacred space for women, an inner sanctum (NG/WKR), a “special space” (CS), a place where women can express their “soulful creativity and innermost feelings” (MWG). Let a single man in our midst? The dynamics would inevitably shift, while “some of us [were] still finding our voices, sharing, experimenting, playing” (NG).

MM II—remember her? The one with a very clear flu-head?—proposed that the Weaving Women could and should intermingle with Man “out there,” for surely we were not going to resemble a Gentlewomen’s Country Club without the club chairs, port, and cigars, were we? Heck no! A chorus of voices rose among the Nayers—can you catch clear flu-head from a distance?—who heartily agreed with the Out There Principle. Yes, yes, “we could re-post their comments, engage them in discussion, just from over there as opposed to over here,” cried NG enthusiastically. Fair enough. Anyone in their right mind would, out of respect, have to agree with Any Woman with a very clear flu-head.

The Out There would be “a space, not the inner sanctum, where our brothers could meet us at the fence to talk and share” (WKR), for Man is not Weaving Women’s adversary. However, to get to the inner sanctum, the holy of holies, Man would have to work very hard at going past the outer court, past the brazen altar, past the veil. The Nayers had very exacting standards. No brill! Fab! Fun! Intel! Excel! jargon for them.

With One Voice, the Nayers and Aye-ayers agreed on this one point: “sexy hulk” would not be and was not part of their criteria, thank you very much.

Stima. Light, electric light. “I have stima!” WM jubilantly wrote, after days of power cuts. She went on ahead to respond to and to tie together in a nice bow all Our Voices above. Thanks to stima that came through for WM, This voice found a no-nonsense open-ended conclusion to All of The Above.

Since the Weaving Women are neither—watch the adjectives line up like toy soldiers— shrinking violets nor “a simpering gaggle of weak-willed women” (WM), since the Weaving Women are outstanding, intelligent, and all the other breathless adjectives, since each Voice belonging to the Weaving Women is unique, powerful,  and cannot be easily dismissed, the way This voice sees it is that we are searching ourselves to see how best to welcome Gender, who’s come to town, without being all encompassing or all exclusive or all loving or all dissenting. No one can be all things to all (wo)men.

In questioning Man’s presence in our midst, we are also questioning how we see ourselves and how we occupy and own our intellectual space. Almost like searching for the Holy Grail. It must be somewhere, no? Don’t see the connection between Holy Grail and Intellectual Space? Oh. Okay.

Memo to MM II, the one who gave Warhol’s 15 minutes a new twist: you might want to write up a ten-thousand-word choric performance on the enlightening benefits of stima (Ode to Stima) in your next quote flu-allocated time online unquote.

After all that hard work of cogitation and of stringing so many words together, This voice, exhausted to the bone, will lie down for a while to rest. Or is she coming down with a clear flu-head?

[Weaving alongside P. Muthoni and "at the fence" with Man (6th of April, 2012 post entry: Weaving)]

Saturday, 31 March 2012

When Women Get Angry

When women get angry
They will build schools,
They will plant trees;
They will establish communities,
They will march in the street.

                                                                              The world might sit up,
                                                                              The world might notice,
                                                                              The world will go on.


When women get angry 
They will destroy each other,
They will restore each other;
They will burn their homes,
They will immolate themselves.

                                                                              The world will sit up.
                                                                              The world will notice.
                                                                              The world will forget.


When women get angry
They will not be silenced,
They will bare their chests;
They will dare to interrupt,
They will shock the world.

                                                                              The world will sit up,
                                                                              The world will notice,
                                                                              The world will scold,
                                                                             “And how dare you!”



The question is not                                                                                                          
How could they,                                                                
How could you                                                                  
Speak out?                                                                         
With such vehemence?                                                    
Such violence?                                                                  
Such ire?                                                                             
Such fury?                                                                          


                 The question is,
                 Why did we,
                 Why did you
                 Speak out?
                 With such pain?
                 Such intensity?
                 Such passion?
                 Such molten lava?


(Woven alongside M. Mwangola News to Note: Loud Enough to Hear Ourselves and continuing the "Women in Leadership" conversation with Margaretta WaGacheru)

Erosion

She walks with sophistication
On these foreign streets,
The world at her fingertips.
She fell into good hands,
Kind arms,
Equipped for a life
Of destiny and choice.

She remembers
Watching her sit under the shade
Of the old Mugumo tree.
She remembers.

Amina

Who reclaimed her independence
And took back her life
By saying No!
To old beliefs, customs, and moral codes.

She knows
She could have been one
Of the silenced voices
With limited choices,
Doing what they thought was best,
For their child’s legitimate honour,

Caressing

Practices that framed their own lives;
Practices that promised ephemeral wealth;
Practices that whispered frail security.

She understands
Traditions that grant that fertile guarantee
To an older male,
Perceived protector, guardian,
Master and lord.

She understands,
She knows,
She remembers,

Her moral charge.

(Woven alongside S. Namwalie Dreams of a Real Man; N. Githongo
A Dedication to the Girls of Aitong Boarding School; M. Mohammedali A Song for Amina; M. Mwangola News to Note: Loud Enough to Hear Ourselves)

Thursday, 15 March 2012

The Knots We Weave

How to untie a knot

“I must get myself a pair of gumboots, “ he mutters to himself, “Gumboots issued by the  government.”

 These gumboots will apparently protect the man’s legs from being hacked by his wife if he happens to cross her the wrong way by, for example, beating her for neglecting the children or for refusing to attend to her marital duties or even, for burning his food. Where was she when the food was on the stove? Talking again with Mama B, the gossip two gates down the road? Just thinking of it and of a possible meal that she will burn in the future makes him want to give her another beating.  He still wonders if the gumboots will come with shin guards. And how will he protect the other vulnerable parts of his body?

Didn’t he hear one day last year on the BBC World News that a mzungu out there chopped off her husband’s genitalia?  The poor man was drugged and tied to the marital bed. He woke up all groggy and just in time to see his wife cutting off his you-know-what. The shameless wife threw the family jewels away with the trash. Ah! The idea in itself is just so painful. The man does not want to think about it, let alone speak about it, in case it gives his wife a few rotten ideas. Hmmm, that already warrants another beating.

I. Do not cut the knot
February 2012:
The man’s income feeds fifteen people, educates nine of them in the extended family. If anything happens to him, there will be no-one else to feed and education the family. He knows that it is not good to beat the mother of his children, but sometimes, he has no other alternative.

Sometimes, Mama Watoto talks back. This undermines him as the head of the home. She argues with him complaining that he spends way too much time away from home at the local bar. She does not seem to understand that a man needs to meet with his friends in an exclusively male environment. She has her chama, the women’s group, and the Mother’s Union, doesn’t she? He does not complain the many Sundays and the few evenings here and there when she is away at a meeting, does he? The children have been suspended from school again, she will nag. Does she think money grows on trees?

It is true that sometimes, I forget and spend more money than I should at the local bar. You have to buy a few rounds otherwise your friends will think ala! He is a henpecked husband, the wife controls the purse strings. I do not want to be any different from the other men. But I am a good man. I try to take care of my family. Has anyone ever found me lying in a ditch dead drunk because I was not able to find my way home? Have the children ever gone to bed hungry because I like my beer?  


II. Inspect the knot. Most tight knots have a loose section that will relax the   whole knot.  If necessary, use a magnifying glass if you cannot see the knot well.
June 2013:
You know what she did the other day?  She looked at me in an odd way as if I was disgracing her. She made me feel ashamed. I had forgotten that her parents were coming to visit us and had taken a few hours off to go have a few beers with my friends. I was only a bit drunk.  If her parents had not been there, I surely would have beaten her for giving me that Look. It is not because she is a headmistress with the necessary certificates that she can look at me like that.  It also bothered me that her parents looked at me with displeasure. It is true that I would have preferred greeting them in a sober state, but what sane Kenyan man leaves a bar in a sober state? We are not Fanta-drinkers.

Her parents seem to know that I beat their daughter. At least, that is what I think. Her mother gives me the Look (like mother, like daughter) when she thinks I am not looking, like she knows something that she shouldn’t. I know she does not like me and that she would have preferred that her daughter marry a man with a white-collar job. Well, her daughter didn’t, did she? She must have found something good in me to defy her mother’s wishes. Good for her!

My wife tells me that her father never beat her mother. I wonder why. My mother was beaten, as was my mother’s mother and my grandmother’s mother. That is how it always has been in my family.

I wonder why my father-in-law never beats my wife’s mother. I wonder what he does when his wife gives him the Look. He does not look henpecked and he does not drink Fanta either. And my mother-in-law does not look perfect.


III. Create as much slack as possible around the knot by twisting the two ends of the knot this way and that.  

May 2015:
There is one thing that all farmers the world over cannot control: the weather. El Nino one year, La Nina the next. I decided to invest in an irrigation scheme. This set us back a bit; I was unable to pay for the children’s school fees and my wife accused me of drinking the school fees money. Women! Could she not see that I was trying to help the whole family? I am a decent farmer, earning an honest and honourable living. I doubt that a white-collar husband would have been able to provide what I have provided for my wife.

Mama Watoto is a very stubborn woman. I have asked her countless times to join me in running our farm. Why pay an overseer when we could be working together? We would be able to save a lot on supervision costs. She always refuses which makes me so angry and that results in my wanting to beat her.

You know what she told me the last time I was forced to beat her? That farming was not her calling. Calling, calling, do you have to be called to be a farmer? Who calls you anyway? That meant that she did not respect me, not only as her husband and as the head of this household, but also as a farmer. Another time I beat her because she said that her mother had warned her against marrying a farmer. Who does she think feeds the family? And feeds the nation, eh? Farmers like me, that’s who.

Even so, I will give credit where due: despite her stubbornness, my wife is a good woman. She is very hardworking and has never put me to shame outside the home. She contributes to the family income, raises chickens and sells the eggs to the other wamama at her chama and to her colleagues in school. She is very respected in our community. People look at us and tell us that we have a good marriage. We are a fine example to the community, even though I do not go to church, which, I think, is for women and children.

One of the reasons why I married her is because she did not laugh when I opened my mouth to speak to her for the very first time.  Even though she went to a teachers' training college, she did not look down on me. Even today, she does not seem to notice my stuttering and does not interrupt me when I am talking.

I had a very hard time in school. I hardly had any friends and my classmates were very unkind; they used to tease me because of my handicap. The mathematics teacher would punish me because I was not quick enough when reciting the multiplication table.  The only time I stop stuttering is after I have had a few beers.

I do not like it when others finish my sentences for me as if I am slow and stupid; or when they get impatient listening to me, lose interest and their eyes start to wander. And they think I do not notice it. I may not have completed my high school education and gone to university but I am not stupid. I own and run a farm, even though it is small-scale farming. We export our produce to Europe, I am not stupid.


IV. Insert a knot pick or an awl into the loosest part of the knot. The kind of picking tool to use will depend on the size of the knot. Work the tool back and forth. Check for loosening. Feed loose rope into the knot as you go along. Repeat as necessary.

September 2016:
We have been expanding and growing for the past three years, the reason why I would have liked my wife to work with me on the farm. I found a bank that gives us a good line of credit. Training courses have taught us how to use less pesticides for better crop treatment and we have learnt how to examine our plants for diseases. We are also learning about food safety and trying to better our labourers’ working conditions. You would be surprised at how our yields have improved and increased.

Europe has set very high standards for all their imported horticultural produce. This reassures the consumer. We are expected to practice good farming methods. The European market also expects us to keep business records going back three years. If then there is a problem, it will be easy to trace the origin of the problem and solve it.  This is what good farming is all about.

February 2017:
I want this farm to be certified which means that we have also gone back to crop rotation in order to improve the quality of the soil. The farmer has to respect specific farming operations procedures. We were audited a few months ago and are now waiting for the outcome of the audit. I believe that we have done all that is required of us and it is with pride that I say that we were ready for the audit.

April 2017:
We are now certified as a farm that has put into use good agricultural practices. And every year we will be ready for the audit.

My wife said that the audit was a very good and positive thing for us. She compared the audit to end-of-year examinations. Because we had worked well, we had gotten good results and a certificate to prove that we had done well. I almost expected her to say, “Very good work, keep it up!” when she was done talking.

We will now have to continue making progress every year to maintain the good farming practices.  I am confident that we will be able to do so.


V. Work carefully with the knot pick or awl to avoid damaging the rope.

April 2017:
When I told my beer-drinking friends about the audit and what my wife had said, they said that people do not know a good thing until they lose it. What did they mean by that? They meant that I had a very good, supportive wife. She should have left me a long time ago.  Has my wife ever insulted me, been rude to me? They asked me. Has she ever talked badly about me to other women behind my back? I had to say no. The funny thing is that some of these men also beat their wives, but they did not understand why I beat mine, even though, lately, I have been beating her less and less.

Needless to say, this got me thinking as to why I beat my wife. I beat her when I am drunk, never when I am sober, even when she annoys me. I wait until I have had a few beers which seems to give me the courage to beat her for whatever she said or did that annoyed me. I do not know why my wife has not left me. I know that her family would take her back with open arms.

I do not know what I would do if she were to leave.


VI. A line, a string or a rope will carry the memory of where a knot has been. The knot, however, does not define the rope, but shapes it.

January 2018:
I heard the other day in the news that a man killed his wife unintentionally in a fit of anger: he beat her to death. Accidentally. The couple had two children, one of whom was in primary school and the older one in secondary school. What will become of the children?

It made me wonder again what I would do if that were to happen to me (I have been doing a lot of thinking the past few months). What would happen to our children? What would happen to the extended family and the farm I have worked so hard on? Even if I were not to kill my wife, but ended up in prison, our lives would be destroyed. Where would that leave our children?

November 2018:
I have not beaten my wife for quite a long while now. I go to the bar less often because of the amount of work on the farm; we have bought more land. We have set high standards for ourselves to maintain, I tell my beer-drinking friends because I do not want them to think that I am a henpecked husband who has lost his rights.

I do not know if I have stopped beating my wife. My father-in-law does not beat his wife. How does he do it?

(Weaving alongside Phyllis Muthoni The Words We Use;
Richly inspired by Rachel Gichinga, Njoki Ngumi, Crystal Simeoni)